A couple years ago, while writing on an unrelated issue, I told this story on this blog:
Back in 1998, a documentary was produced called Anatomy of a “Homicide: Life on the Street”. It was an analysis of behind-the-scenes and making-of an episode of the NBC police drama, followed by an airing of that episode. One of the issues that was examined was the back-and-forth between the writers and the network censors. To the writers, this was often a game — “how much can we get away with?” And one of the strategies that they employed in the game was classic misdirection. They had a particularly violent scene that they wanted in the episode, but they knew that the censors would never allow it. So they went nuts with foul language right before and right after that scene. The foul language jumped out at the censors and they balked at it, making the writers trim it back. They did so “reluctantly” and did the happy dance back in their offices, as the censors totally missed (and therefore allowed) what was really important to the writers.
Now, since I’m not God, nor do I wield Matthew 7:16 as a magic wand, I can’t divine the motives of others. But I have to wonder if Derek Webb didn’t do a similar thing with his latest album, Stockholm Syndrome.
Last month, I noted the controvery over the song “What Matters More“, as it contains two words allegedly not used in polite company. These two words are ostensibly more offensive to the sensibilities than references to bloody tampons, walking around and preaching naked for three years, publicly cooking over human feces and eating the results, and the desire to see others mutilate their genitals. And never mind that the employ of these words was a microcosm of the whole point of the song, anyway.
But I digress . . . .
Stockholm Syndrome is so loaded with prophetic condemnation of the American Church, that one has to wonder if the use of strong language in one song was a misdirection to keep the naysayers (not to mention the record label and the Christian bookstores) from noticing the other scathing content. Just a few songs and the issues that they address:
- “The Spirit vs The Kick Drum” looks at the heinous things that we say with our lives, but would never verbalize
- “What Matters More” (when not being criticized for its language) asks if it’s really more important to fight the culture wars than to minister to the sick and dying
- “The State” takes Christians to task for the blurring obliteration of the line between faith and Americanism
- “Heaven” bemoans our obsession with materialism and the subsequent ignoring of the “least of these”
Such issues simply don’t fit in with the other things sold at your average Christian bookstore. And let’s be honest — it’s not because the stores are shallow in and of themselves. Any store that stays in business for any length of time must reflect the priorities of the majority of its customer base.
Granted, there are other means/venues for Webb to sell his music and deliver his message. But considering the audience that most needs to hear this message, I can’t help but wonder if one song wasn’t (at least partially) designed to take attention away from the others, at least long enough for the listener to take his medicine.
A friend of mine was recently asked what his “position” was on a particular issue. It is an issue about which there is presently very little information. It is also an issue that, while possibly important, has no bearing whatsoever on my friend or anyone that he knows. This is mainly because, even though it’s public knowledge, it only involves a handful of people. So I really have to wonder, why would anyone care what his “position” is? Why does he even have to have a “position”?
My Facebook status yesterday noted that This Train was possibly “getting the band back together”. It’s looking more and more like that’s a probability, rather than just a quote from the Blues Brothers.
There’s an 